All Funds
We found 11,570 funds for you. Want help finding the best ones? Check out the Minafi Investor Bootcamp.
- gcvax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Insights Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- glccx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- gmccx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
Nationwide Mid Cap Market Index Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- grmcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- gsczx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- gsmax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- gxxix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Aberdeen U.S. Multi-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Service Class
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- hasox
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
Harbor Funds - Harbor Small Cap Growth Opportunities Fund
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- hwlix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »