• smecx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Blend

Invesco Small Cap Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• sscox
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Blend

Touchstone Small Company Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• arsvx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Blend

AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• wmmax
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Blend

TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• afsm
• ETF
• US Stocks
• Small Blend

First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• bscvx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Blend

Bernzott US Small Cap Value Fund

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• arimx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Blend

AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• aatsx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Blend

Ancora/Thelen Small-Mid Cap Fund Class S

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• acrtx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Blend

AMG Managers Silvercrest Small Cap Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• cwsix
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Blend

Chartwell Small Cap Value Fund

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »