XMLV : Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF

XMLV is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Value with LOW fees.

XMLV

Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF

FI Score

72 /100

Diversification Rating

5 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

8 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,182 US Stocks Mid-Cap Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare XMLV vs FGTBX

27% FI Score
  • fgtbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Federated Global Total Return Bond Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs FIFIX

27% FI Score
  • fifix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Delaware Fund for Income Class A

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs FIINX

27% FI Score
  • fiinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Delaware International Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs FIRVX

27% FI Score
  • firvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs FKU

27% FI Score
  • fku
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

First Trust United Kingdom AlphaDEX Fund

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs FLN

27% FI Score
  • fln
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Latin America Stock

First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Latin America Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs GITAX

27% FI Score
  • gitax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs HSSAX

27% FI Score
  • hssax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Emerald Banking and Finance Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs ICCIX

27% FI Score
  • iccix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Dynamic International Opportunity Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs KHYCX

27% FI Score
  • khycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

DWS High Income Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs KTCCX

27% FI Score
  • ktccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

DWS Science and Technology Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs LDMAX

27% FI Score
  • ldmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Lord Abbett Emerging Markets Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs PNRCX

27% FI Score
  • pnrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs POICX

27% FI Score
  • poicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs RYACX

27% FI Score
  • ryacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

Rydex Inverse NASDAQ-100® Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs RYAFX

27% FI Score
  • ryafx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

Rydex Inverse Russell 2000® Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs RYSHX

27% FI Score
  • ryshx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

Rydex Inverse Russell 2000® Strategy Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs SRMCX

27% FI Score
  • srmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

DWS Short Term Municipal Bond Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs TCPCX

27% FI Score
  • tcpcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Touchstone Impact Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare XMLV vs THNMX

27% FI Score
  • thnmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Thornburg New Mexico Intermediate Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo