XLF : Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund

XLF is a Sector Equity Market Financial Services with LOW fees.

XLF

Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund

FI Score

71 /100

Diversification Rating

3 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

9 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

10 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,815 Sector Equity Financial Services funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare XLF vs UGE

25% FI Score
  • uge
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare XLF vs CAACX

25% FI Score
  • caacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Calvert Growth Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare XLF vs YASSX

25% FI Score
  • yassx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare XLF vs ESGEX

25% FI Score
  • esgex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Reynders McVeigh Core Equity Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XLF vs HCMDX

25% FI Score
  • hcmdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

HCM Tactical Growth Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 2.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XLF vs THLSX

25% FI Score
  • thlsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Thornburg Long/Short Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 3.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare XLF vs SSUIX

25% FI Score
  • ssuix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Guggenheim Small Cap Value Institutional Fund

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XLF vs RFAP

25% FI Score
  • rfap
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific Stock

First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Asia Pacific ETF

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XLF vs HDPMX

25% FI Score
  • hdpmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Hodges Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XLF vs WVCCX

25% FI Score
  • wvccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Aberdeen International Small Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XLF vs UUSTX

25% FI Score
  • uustx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

USAA Ultra Short-Term Bond Fund Shares

Expenses: 0.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare XLF vs EFGIX

25% FI Score
  • efgix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Focused Global Opportunities Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare XLF vs FRRSX

25% FI Score
  • frrsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Franklin Real Estate Securities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare XLF vs WTLTX

25% FI Score
  • wtltx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Segall Bryant & Hamill Quality High Yield Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare XLF vs LIMAX

25% FI Score
  • limax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Lateef Focused Sustainable Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XLF vs ESVIX

25% FI Score
  • esvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Global Small-Cap Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare XLF vs VMCCX

25% FI Score
  • vmccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XLF vs FPCGX

25% FI Score
  • fpcgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Fort Pitt Capital Total Return Fund

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XLF vs ETEGX

25% FI Score
  • etegx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XLF vs VFPIX

25% FI Score
  • vfpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Private Capital Management Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo