XDIV : Metaurus U.S. Equity Ex-Dividend Fund-Series 2027

XDIV is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with MODERATE fees.

XDIV

Metaurus U.S. Equity Ex-Dividend Fund-Series 2027

FI Score

51 /100

Diversification Rating

8 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

4 /10

Market Score

1 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

1 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare XDIV vs ICLLX

33% FI Score
  • icllx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Transamerica Asset Allocation Conservative Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs MMIFX

33% FI Score
  • mmifx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Federated Michigan Intermediate Municipal Trust Class A Shares

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs MMRBX

33% FI Score
  • mmrbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MainStay Moderate Allocation Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs MMRCX

33% FI Score
  • mmrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MainStay Moderate Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs HLMSX

33% FI Score
  • hlmsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio Investor

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs ETGIX

33% FI Score
  • etgix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • India Stock

Eaton Vance Greater India Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a India Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs EUGDX

33% FI Score
  • eugdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

Morgan Stanley Europe Opportunity Fund Inc. Class I

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs MSDIX

33% FI Score
  • msdix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MainStay MacKay Unconstrained Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs MSEAX

33% FI Score
  • mseax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

MainStay MacKay International Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs AFTY

33% FI Score
  • afty
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs MBNAX

33% FI Score
  • mbnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MainStay Balanced Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs MGQIX

33% FI Score
  • mgqix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Sustain Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs PTUZX

33% FI Score
  • ptuzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

PIMCO Total Return Fund IV Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs PYZ

33% FI Score
  • pyz
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs MFLDX

33% FI Score
  • mfldx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Marketfield Fund Class I

Expenses: 2.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs RFRAX

33% FI Score
  • rfrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Columbia Floating Rate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs IBLLX

33% FI Score
  • ibllx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs HWHCX

33% FI Score
  • hwhcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hotchkis & Wiley High Yield Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs MTZKX

33% FI Score
  • mtzkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Manning & Napier Target 2055 Series Class K

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs NAMFX

33% FI Score
  • namfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Intermediate Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo