XDIV : Metaurus U.S. Equity Ex-Dividend Fund-Series 2027

XDIV is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with MODERATE fees.

XDIV

Metaurus U.S. Equity Ex-Dividend Fund-Series 2027

FI Score

51 /100

Diversification Rating

8 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

4 /10

Market Score

1 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

1 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare XDIV vs DWAT

35% FI Score
  • dwat
  • ETF
  • Other
  • Tactical Allocation

Arrow DWA Tactical ETF

Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Tactical Allocation Other fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs EBNAX

35% FI Score
  • ebnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

American Funds Emerging Markets Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs ECEIX

35% FI Score
  • eceix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Lazard Emerging Markets Core Equity Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs ECFAX

35% FI Score
  • ecfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs ECGMX

35% FI Score
  • ecgmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs ECLTX

35% FI Score
  • ecltx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Parametric TABS 5-to-15 Year Laddered Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs EKWDX

35% FI Score
  • ekwdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Wells Fargo Precious Metals Fund - Class Admin

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs EMSH

35% FI Score
  • emsh
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

ProShares Short Term USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs ERBCX

35% FI Score
  • erbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein Equity Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs ETIHX

35% FI Score
  • etihx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Eventide Healthcare & Life Sciences Fund CLASS I SHARES

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs EVCGX

35% FI Score
  • evcgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Eaton Vance Greater China Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs EXNYX

35% FI Score
  • exnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Eaton Vance New York Municipal Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs FCFRX

35% FI Score
  • fcfrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs FIRNX

35% FI Score
  • firnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Fidelity Simplicity RMD Income Fund

Expenses: 0.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs FPIVX

35% FI Score
  • fpivx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

FPA International Value Fund

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs FXZ

35% FI Score
  • fxz
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs FYHTX

35% FI Score
  • fyhtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

Fidelity® Commodity Strategy Fund

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs GERCX

35% FI Score
  • gercx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Equity Insights Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs GDMIX

35% FI Score
  • gdmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Lazard Global Dynamic Multi-Asset Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare XDIV vs GGHCX

35% FI Score
  • gghcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Invesco Health Care Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo