WUSMX : Wells Fargo Ultra Short-Term Municipal Income Fund - Class Admin

WUSMX is a Bond Market Municipal Bond with MODERATE fees.

WUSMX

Wells Fargo Ultra Short-Term Municipal Income Fund - Class Admin

FI Score

65 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

4 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond Municipal Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare WUSMX vs FEFAX

39% FI Score
  • fefax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

First Eagle Fund of America Class A

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs PWS

39% FI Score
  • pws
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Pacer WealthShield ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs ITTSX

39% FI Score
  • ittsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Hartford Multi-Asset Income and Growth Fund Class R4

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs QEENX

39% FI Score
  • qeenx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

AQR Emerging Multi-Style Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs RYIPX

39% FI Score
  • ryipx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Royce International Premier Fund Service Class

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs MMDAX

39% FI Score
  • mmdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Madison Moderate Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs MRCGX

39% FI Score
  • mrcgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Meridian Growth Fund® Class C

Expenses: 1.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs JFFCX

39% FI Score
  • jffcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

JPMorgan SmartRetirement® 2055 Fund Class C

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs JJA

39% FI Score
  • jja
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

iPath Series B Bloomberg Agriculture Subindex Total Return ETN

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs KLGAX

39% FI Score
  • klgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

MainStay MacKay Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs RYOCX

39% FI Score
  • ryocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Rydex NASDAQ-100® Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs MTQKX

39% FI Score
  • mtqkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Manning & Napier Target 2035 Series Class K

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs JHMA

39% FI Score
  • jhma
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

John Hancock Multifactor Materials ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs FRNRX

39% FI Score
  • frnrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Franklin Natural Resources Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs NEFSX

39% FI Score
  • nefsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Natixis Funds Trust I U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs TQSMX

39% FI Score
  • tqsmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small & Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs SCIJ

39% FI Score
  • scij
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

Global X Scientific Beta Japan ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs NPNCX

39% FI Score
  • npncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs LBFIX

38% FI Score
  • lbfix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

ClearBridge Select Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs PPDM

38% FI Score
  • ppdm
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

PortfolioPlus Developed Markets ETF

Expenses: 0.51% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo