WUSMX : Wells Fargo Ultra Short-Term Municipal Income Fund - Class Admin

WUSMX is a Bond Market Municipal Bond with MODERATE fees.

WUSMX

Wells Fargo Ultra Short-Term Municipal Income Fund - Class Admin

FI Score

65 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

4 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond Municipal Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare WUSMX vs FLQD

39% FI Score
  • flqd
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Franklin LibertyQ Global Dividend ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs FQUAX

39% FI Score
  • fquax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

AMG FQ Long-Short Equity Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs FTGOX

39% FI Score
  • ftgox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Salient Tactical Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs FXE

39% FI Score
  • fxe
  • ETF
  • Money Market
  • Single Currency

Invesco CurrencyShares Euro Currency Trust

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Single Currency Money Market fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs FYLD

39% FI Score
  • fyld
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs GAINX

39% FI Score
  • gainx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Guinness Atkinson Dividend Builder Fund

Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs GATMX

39% FI Score
  • gatmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Goldman Sachs International Tax-Managed Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs GLVAX

39% FI Score
  • glvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Focus Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs GYLD

39% FI Score
  • gyld
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs HEWI

39% FI Score
  • hewi
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Italy ETF

Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs HIIGX

39% FI Score
  • hiigx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Harbor International Growth Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs HILCX

39% FI Score
  • hilcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Hartford International Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs HRCPX

39% FI Score
  • hrcpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Carillon ClariVest Capital Appreciation Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs HTUS

39% FI Score
  • htus
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Hull Tactical US ETF

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs HWSAX

39% FI Score
  • hwsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs HWVAX

39% FI Score
  • hwvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Diversified Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs IFRA

39% FI Score
  • ifra
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Global Equity

iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs ILLLX

39% FI Score
  • illlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Transamerica Capital Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs IMAAX

39% FI Score
  • imaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Ivy Apollo Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WUSMX vs IPAY

39% FI Score
  • ipay
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo