WTABX : Wilmington Municipal Bond Fund Class A

WTABX is a Bond Market Municipal Bond with MODERATE fees.

WTABX

Wilmington Municipal Bond Fund Class A

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond Municipal Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare WTABX vs ICFSX

15% FI Score
  • icfsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

ICON Financial Fund Class S

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs GMCAX

15% FI Score
  • gmcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

AllianzGI Micro Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs MMECX

15% FI Score
  • mmecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Victory Integrity Discovery Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs PCYIX

15% FI Score
  • pcyix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

PCS Commodity Strategy Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs PDRFX

15% FI Score
  • pdrfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Putnam Dynamic Risk Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs PJEAX

15% FI Score
  • pjeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

PGIM US Real Estate Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs CCDVX

15% FI Score
  • ccdvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Calamos Dividend Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs ACVKX

15% FI Score
  • acvkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

AC Alternatives® Market Neutral Value Fund I Class

Expenses: 3.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs MSULX

15% FI Score
  • msulx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class L

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs LPVIX

15% FI Score
  • lpvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2055 Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs RYHIX

15% FI Score
  • ryhix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Rydex Health Care Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs CIPDX

15% FI Score
  • cipdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Champlain Emerging Markets Fund Advisor Shares

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs NUICX

15% FI Score
  • nuicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Nuveen Santa Barbara International Dividend Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs DGBP

15% FI Score
  • dgbp
  • ETF
  • Money Market
  • World

Citigroup ETNs linked to the VelocityShares Daily 4X Long USD vs. GBP Index

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a World Money Market fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs RYEIX

15% FI Score
  • ryeix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Rydex Energy Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs DAG

15% FI Score
  • dag
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

DB Agriculture Double Long ETN

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs GSYAX

15% FI Score
  • gsyax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Goldman Sachs Imprint Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs SZK

15% FI Score
  • szk
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs PRTBX

15% FI Score
  • prtbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare WTABX vs ICEEX

15% FI Score
  • iceex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

ICON Energy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo