Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$WSHCX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- pjecx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Real Estate
PGIM US Real Estate Fund- Class C
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »
- ryjsx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Leveraged Equities
Rydex Japan 2x Strategy Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »
- stpcx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Technology
Saratoga Technology & Communications Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 2.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- tricx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- reicx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Real Estate
West Loop Realty Fund Class C Shares
Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »
- rentx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Real Estate
Shelton Real Estate Income Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »
- ujpy
- ETF
- Money Market
- World
Citigroup ETNs linked to the VelocityShares Daily 4X Long JPY vs. USD Index
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a World Money Market fund. See why »
- htecx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Technology
Hennessy Technology Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- cchyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »