Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
4 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
1 /10
$WRLDX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- pidcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Pioneer Solutions - Balanced Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mktrx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MainStay Income Builder Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- wgfix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
William Blair Global Leaders Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- deqax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
BNY Mellon Global Equity Income Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- fihd
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
UBS AG FI Enhanced Global High Yield ETN
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- imaax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Ivy Apollo Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- portx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gyld
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- dglcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
BNY Mellon Global Stock Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »