WIL : Barclays Women in Leadership ETN

WIL is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with MODERATE fees.

WIL

Barclays Women in Leadership ETN

FI Score

46 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

6 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare WIL vs EIHSX

36% FI Score
  • eihsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs EQIDX

36% FI Score
  • eqidx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund - Class Admin

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs EVOAX

36% FI Score
  • evoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

Altegris Futures Evolution Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs FCGBX

36% FI Score
  • fcgbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Templeton Global Balanced Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs FMNBX

36% FI Score
  • fmnbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Federated Muni and Stock Advantage Fund Class B Shares

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs FOTAX

36% FI Score
  • fotax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Nuveen Oregon Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs FPA

36% FI Score
  • fpa
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

First Trust Asia Pacific Ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs FTCLX

36% FI Score
  • ftclx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs FTXO

36% FI Score
  • ftxo
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs GRZZX

36% FI Score
  • grzzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

Grizzly Short Fund

Expenses: 2.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs GSZAX

36% FI Score
  • gszax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Goldman Sachs Strategic Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs HMJAX

36% FI Score
  • hmjax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Hartford Municipal Short Duration Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs HSDRX

36% FI Score
  • hsdrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Short Duration Fund Class R3

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs IAALX

36% FI Score
  • iaalx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Transamerica Asset Allocation Growth Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs PJIZX

36% FI Score
  • pjizx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

PGIM QMA International Equity Fund- Class Z

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs PLNCX

36% FI Score
  • plncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Pacific Funds Core Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs PMACX

36% FI Score
  • pmacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Pioneer Multi-Asset Income Fund C

Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs PMZNX

36% FI Score
  • pmznx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO Mortgage Opportunities and Bond Fund Class I-3

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs JCRIX

36% FI Score
  • jcrix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

ALPS/CoreCommodity Management CompleteCommodities Strategy Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare WIL vs JGIFX

36% FI Score
  • jgifx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

John Hancock Government Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo