Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
4 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$WFQVX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 434 Allocation Target-Date funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ffbsx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Fidelity Freedom® Blend 2065 Fund
Expenses: 0.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- wfqzx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Wells Fargo Target 2055 Fund - Class A
Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- firvx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund
Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- wfdmx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Wells Fargo Target 2030 Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- ltmdx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
MFS Lifetime 2045 Fund Class C
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- lprax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic Retirement Fund Investor A Shares
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- wfofx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Wells Fargo Target 2040 Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- mffdx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
MFS Lifetime 2050 Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- wfafx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Wells Fargo Target 2060 Fund - Class A
Expenses: 0.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »