WFQBX : Wells Fargo Target 2035 Fund - Class A

WFQBX is a Allocation Market Target-Date with HIGH fees.

WFQBX

Wells Fargo Target 2035 Fund - Class A

FI Score

37 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

3 /10

Expense Rating

4 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,682 Allocation Target-Date funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare WFQBX vs FID

42% FI Score
  • fid
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WFQBX vs FJPNX

42% FI Score
  • fjpnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

Fidelity® Japan Fund

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WFQBX vs FLBL

42% FI Score
  • flbl
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare WFQBX vs FNGO

42% FI Score
  • fngo
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare WFQBX vs FRFZX

42% FI Score
  • frfzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Floating Rate Income Fund- Class Z

Expenses: 0.72% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare WFQBX vs FRUSX

42% FI Score
  • frusx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

Franklin Utilities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare WFQBX vs FSHCX

42% FI Score
  • fshcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Fidelity® Select Health Care Services Portfolio

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare WFQBX vs FSTCX

42% FI Score
  • fstcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Communication Services

Fidelity® Select Telecommunications Portfolio

Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Communication Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare WFQBX vs FTXH

42% FI Score
  • ftxh
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare WFQBX vs FXR

42% FI Score
  • fxr
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund

Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare WFQBX vs GCSAX

42% FI Score
  • gcsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity Insights Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WFQBX vs GEGCX

42% FI Score
  • gegcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Aberdeen Emerging Markets Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WFQBX vs GERAX

42% FI Score
  • gerax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Equity Insights Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WFQBX vs GMZ

42% FI Score
  • gmz
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Master Limited Partnership

Goldman Sachs MLP Income Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 3.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Master Limited Partnership Other fund. See why »

Compare WFQBX vs LIDAX

42% FI Score
  • lidax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Lord Abbett International Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WFQBX vs GSAOX

42% FI Score
  • gsaox
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Insights Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WFQBX vs GSPQX

42% FI Score
  • gspqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WFQBX vs GUDB

42% FI Score
  • gudb
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Sage ESG Intermediate Credit ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare WFQBX vs HISGX

42% FI Score
  • hisgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Harbor Small Cap Growth Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare WFQBX vs HLMRX

42% FI Score
  • hlmrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio Institutional

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo