Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
6 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$WFILX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 668 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- mfqax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
AMG FQ Tax-Managed U.S. Equity Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- dhtcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Diamond Hill All Cap Select Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- vdscx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Victory Diversified Stock Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- badax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Brown Advisory Equity Income Fund Advisor Shares
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- lzuox
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio Open Shares
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- pjdzx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend Fund- Class Z
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ndgax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Neuberger Berman Dividend Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- bmpex
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Beck, Mack & Oliver Partners Fund
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- moatx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Castle Focus Fund Class Investor
Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »