Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
6 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$WATFX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,623 Bond Total US Bond Market funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- hracx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Hartford Growth Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- hwscx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Value
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- iedcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Voya Large Cap Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- iigcx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Basic Materials
VanEck International Investors Gold Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »
- gauax
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Utilities
Gabelli Utilities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »
- gicpx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Gabelli Global Growth Fund Class AAA
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- dilcx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
Davis International Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- dug
- ETF
- Alternative
- Inverse
ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »
- dveax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Delaware Select Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »