WARCX : Wells Fargo Absolute Return Fund - Class C

WARCX is a Allocation Market Total World with HIGH fees.

WARCX

Wells Fargo Absolute Return Fund - Class C

FI Score

45 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

3 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Similar Funds

We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare WARCX vs OARGX

43% FI Score
  • oargx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Oakmark Global Fund Service Class

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WARCX vs FOOLX

43% FI Score
  • foolx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFAM Global Opportunities Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WARCX vs IVWCX

43% FI Score
  • ivwcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

IVA Worldwide Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WARCX vs AMTAX

43% FI Score
  • amtax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

AB All Market Real Return Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WARCX vs AWACX

43% FI Score
  • awacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

AB Wealth Appreciation Strategy Class C

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WARCX vs JRI

43% FI Score
  • jri
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Nuveen Real Asset Income and Growth Fund

Expenses: 2.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WARCX vs ESGYX

43% FI Score
  • esgyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WARCX vs CGO

43% FI Score
  • cgo
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Calamos Global Total Return Fund

Expenses: 3.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WARCX vs CHW

43% FI Score
  • chw
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund

Expenses: 3.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WARCX vs JOGIX

43% FI Score
  • jogix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

JOHCM Global Equity Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WARCX vs RAPIX

43% FI Score
  • rapix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc Class I

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WARCX vs MAEGX

43% FI Score
  • maegx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

BlackRock Long-Horizon Equity Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WARCX vs QGRNX

43% FI Score
  • qgrnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Allocation Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WARCX vs BPGLX

43% FI Score
  • bpglx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

UBS Global Allocation Fund Class P

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WARCX vs HGXTX

43% FI Score
  • hgxtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Hartford Global Impact Fund Class R5

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WARCX vs IMRFX

43% FI Score
  • imrfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Columbia Global Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WARCX vs WRLDX

42% FI Score
  • wrldx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Scharf Global Opportunity Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WARCX vs BCBDX

42% FI Score
  • bcbdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

BlackRock Global Dividend Portfolio Investor C Shares

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WARCX vs RSGGX

42% FI Score
  • rsggx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Victory RS Global Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare WARCX vs AWSAX

42% FI Score
  • awsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Global Core Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo