Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
3 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$WARAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- lsggx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund Class Y
Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ekgyx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Wells Fargo Global Small Cap Fund Class Admin
Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mwocx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MFS Global Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- dvfax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Cohen & Steers Alternative Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gxscx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Goldman Sachs Satellite Strategies Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- csrcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Columbia Global Dividend Opportunity Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- arthx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Artisan Global Equity Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- aglcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
American Century Focused Global Growth Fund C Class
Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- glvcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Invesco Oppenheimer Global Focus Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- sgifx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- pqizx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
PIMCO Dividend and Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gmcix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
LMCG Global MultiCap Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- rapax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc Class A
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mwobx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MFS Global Growth Fund Class B
Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- fiyy
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
Barclays ETN+ FI Enhanced Global High Yield ETN B
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- sgapx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Virtus SGA Global Growth I Class
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- deqcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
BNY Mellon Global Equity Income Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gggax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Gabelli Global Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gicpx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Gabelli Global Growth Fund Class AAA
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »