Diversification Rating
0 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
4 /10
Market Score
0 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
0 /10
We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
Goldman Sachs Target Date 2025 Portfolio A Shares
Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
MFS Lifetime 2035 Fund Class C
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund Class C
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
Catalyst Insider Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Federated U.S. Government Securities Fund 1-3 Years Service Shares
Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
Delaware Healthcare Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »
Goldman Sachs Target Date 2035 Portfolio A Shares
Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
Goldman Sachs Strategic Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Morgan Stanley Mortgage Securities Trust Class A
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
MFS California Municipal Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2024 Adam Fortuna
Site Map