Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$VNSCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 668 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- acsi
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
American Customer Satisfaction ETF
Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- tlcyx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Touchstone Large Cap Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- arsqx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Aristotle Value Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- varix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Virtus Rampart Sector Trend Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- jlcax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
JPMorgan U.S. Large Cap Core Plus Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- gtcex
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Glenmede Strategic Equity Portfolio
Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- mapax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
MainStay MAP Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- cavax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund Class F
Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- jlpcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
JPMorgan U.S. Large Cap Core Plus Fund Class C Shares
Expenses: 2.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »