Diversification Rating
9 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
10 /10
Expense Rating
9 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$VIS Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,815 Sector Equity Industrials funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- neamx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Neiman Large Cap Value Fund A Shares
Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- ldvcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Leland Thomson Reuters Venture Capital Index Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- htscx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Value
Hartford Small Cap Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- spcax
- Mutual Fund
- Commodities
- Broad
SilverPepper Commodity Strategies Global Macro Fund Advisor Class
Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »
- clcnx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Columbia Multi-Asset Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- railx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Conductor Global Equity Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- nsoix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
North Star Opportunity Fund Class I Shares
Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- afadx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Applied Finance Dividend Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- esvax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Eaton Vance Global Small-Cap Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- drfmx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Securities Fund Class A
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- gigcx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Growth
Aberdeen International Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- drecx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Real Estate
Davis Real Estate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »
- dpscx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
BNY Mellon Structured Midcap Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- dprcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Delaware Global Listed Real Assets Fund C Class
Expenses: 2.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- rymfx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Future
Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class P
Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »
- cnwdx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- dnrex
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Real Estate
Dunham Real Estate Stock Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »
- husix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Value
Huber Capital Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »