Expense Ratio Rating
10 /10
Expense Rating
10 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$VIGAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 643 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- sdgcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
DWS Capital Growth Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- jcicx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
JPMorgan Intrepid Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- dwocx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
BNY Mellon Research Growth Fund, Inc. Class C
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- jpfsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
JPMorgan Equity Focus Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ekoax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Wells Fargo Omega Growth Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ryatx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Rydex NASDAQ-100® Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- adsix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
American Century Disciplined Growth Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ryhox
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Rydex NASDAQ-100® Fund Class H
Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- dpuax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
BNY Mellon U.S. Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »