Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
9 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$VGSLX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 11,026 Alternatives Real Estate funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- jnssx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
JPMorgan SmartRetirement® 2025 Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.22% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- fmusx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Federated Municipal Ultrashort Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.36% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- amrmx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
American Funds American Mutual Fund® Class A
Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- awshx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.57% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- bagsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Baird Aggregate Bond Fund Class Investor
Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- bcrix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
BlackRock CoreAlpha Bond Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.28% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- macfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
MFS Conservative Allocation Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.33% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- bmoax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund Investor A Shares
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- tglmx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
TCW Total Return Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- tmgix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Growth Portfolio Class I
Expenses: 0.26% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- gsie
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- hauz
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock
Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF
Expenses: 0.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
- plsax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.46% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- jagg
- ETF
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
JPMorgan U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.07% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- mseqx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Growth Portfolio Class I
Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- faofx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Fidelity Advisor® Series Growth Opportunities Fund
Expenses: 0.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- fdewx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Fidelity Freedom® Index 2055 Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- fdgfx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Fidelity® Dividend Growth Fund
Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »