UUPSX : ProFunds UltraEmerging Markets Fund Service Class

UUPSX is a Alternative Market Leveraged Equities with HIGH fees.

UUPSX

ProFunds UltraEmerging Markets Fund Service Class

FI Score

6 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

0 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,170 Alternative Leveraged Equities funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare UUPSX vs AGBVX

46% FI Score
  • agbvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • International

American Century Global Bond Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a International Bond fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs BGAFX

46% FI Score
  • bgafx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Baron Global Advantage Fund Retail Shares

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs CNXT

46% FI Score
  • cnxt
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs HQBSX

46% FI Score
  • hqbsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Hartford Quality Bond Fund Class R4

Expenses: 0.61% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs IAF

46% FI Score
  • iaf
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

Aberdeen Australia Equity Fund Inc

Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs NECZX

46% FI Score
  • neczx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs SNTCX

46% FI Score
  • sntcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs ETILX

46% FI Score
  • etilx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Eventide Gilead Class I

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs ACAAX

46% FI Score
  • acaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs MIQBX

46% FI Score
  • miqbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. International Equity Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs MACGX

46% FI Score
  • macgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Discovery Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs GOEX

46% FI Score
  • goex
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Global X Gold Explorers ETF

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs PRLAX

46% FI Score
  • prlax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Latin America Stock

T. Rowe Price Latin America Fund

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Latin America Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs POAAX

46% FI Score
  • poaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Conservative Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs BFICX

46% FI Score
  • bficx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

American Funds Inflation Linked Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs FHAQX

46% FI Score
  • fhaqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Fidelity Freedom® Blend 2045 Fund

Expenses: 0.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs JCMVX

46% FI Score
  • jcmvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs SCFFX

46% FI Score
  • scffx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund Class F

Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs ETHO

46% FI Score
  • etho
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF

Expenses: 0.47% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare UUPSX vs IANAX

46% FI Score
  • ianax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement Now Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo