Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
5 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
1 /10
$UTBPX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,623 Bond Total US Bond Market funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- igiux
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Integrity Growth & Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- esvax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Eaton Vance Global Small-Cap Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- kmvax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
Kirr Marbach Partners Value Fund
Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- epasx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
EP Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- htscx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Value
Hartford Small Cap Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- lvagx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
LSV Global Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- hedjx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Short
Scharf Alpha Opportunity Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
- gigcx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Growth
Aberdeen International Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- gllsx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Aberdeen Global Equity Fund Institutional Service Class
Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »