Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
8 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
8 /10
$USWGX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- naefx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
New Alternatives Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- sghix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Sextant Global High Income Fund
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- wfggx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
WCM Focused Global Growth Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- aaapx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- cetax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Centerstone Investors Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- fiisx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Delaware Global Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- rsscx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Columbia Global Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- clacx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AdvisorOne CLS Global Aggressive Equity Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- evgbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Evermore Global Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »