Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
5 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$USNQX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 643 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- seegx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- fbcgx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Fidelity® Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- jcapx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Janus Henderson Forty Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- fhofx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Fidelity® Series Large Cap Growth Index Fund
Expenses: 0.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ampfx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
American Funds AMCAP Fund® Class F-1
Expenses: 0.72% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- fdssx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Fidelity® Stock Selector All Cap Fund
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- fdesx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Fidelity Advisor® Diversified Stock Fund Class O
Expenses: 0.46% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- lsgrx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- swlgx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Schwab ® U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
Expenses: 0.04% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »