USEQ : Invesco Russell 1000 Enhanced Equal Weight ETF

USEQ is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Blend with LOW fees.

USEQ

Invesco Russell 1000 Enhanced Equal Weight ETF

FI Score

49 /100

Diversification Rating

6 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

7 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,161 US Stocks Mid-Cap Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare USEQ vs ALGCX

17% FI Score
  • algcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Alger International Focus Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs AMFQX

17% FI Score
  • amfqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

361 Managed Futures Strategy Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 2.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs ARMZX

17% FI Score
  • armzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Western Asset Ultra-Short Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs LONGX

17% FI Score
  • longx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Longboard Alternative Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs BXEAX

17% FI Score
  • bxeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Barings Emerging Markets Debt Blended Total Return Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs BXHAX

17% FI Score
  • bxhax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Barings U.S. High Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs CASAX

17% FI Score
  • casax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific Stock

Columbia Pacific/Asia Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs CAXCX

17% FI Score
  • caxcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Catalyst/MAP Global Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs PGYCX

17% FI Score
  • pgycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Pioneer Global High Yield Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs CHUSX

17% FI Score
  • chusx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Alger Global Focus Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs QCBGX

17% FI Score
  • qcbgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Federated MDT Balanced Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 2.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs FLOTX

16% FI Score
  • flotx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Power Floating Rate Index Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs FRFDX

16% FI Score
  • frfdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Delaware Floating Rate II Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs FLSKX

16% FI Score
  • flskx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Franklin LifeSmart™ 2050 Retirement Target Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs RRFCX

16% FI Score
  • rrfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Federated Real Return Bond Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs GLNBX

16% FI Score
  • glnbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Global New Discovery Fund Class B

Expenses: 2.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs GLNCX

16% FI Score
  • glncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Global New Discovery Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs GRECX

16% FI Score
  • grecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Goldman Sachs Real Estate Securities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs IASMX

16% FI Score
  • iasmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs IDVIX

16% FI Score
  • idvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Copeland International Risk Managed Dividend Growth Fund Class I Shares

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo