USEQ : Invesco Russell 1000 Enhanced Equal Weight ETF

USEQ is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Blend with LOW fees.

USEQ

Invesco Russell 1000 Enhanced Equal Weight ETF

FI Score

49 /100

Diversification Rating

6 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

7 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,161 US Stocks Mid-Cap Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare USEQ vs JNBCX

49% FI Score
  • jnbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

JPMorgan Income Builder Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs OSMNX

49% FI Score
  • osmnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Invesco Oppenheimer International Small-Mid Company Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.57% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs SBALX

49% FI Score
  • sbalx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Victory Strategic Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs GCIAX

49% FI Score
  • gciax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs JO

49% FI Score
  • jo
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Broad

iPath Series B Bloomberg Coffee Subindex Total Return ETN

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs BBNTX

49% FI Score
  • bbntx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Sterling Capital North Carolina Intermediate Tax-Free Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs HLEMX

49% FI Score
  • hlemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Harding Loevner Emerging Markets Portfolio Advisor Class

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs JBLGX

49% FI Score
  • jblgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Growth Portfolio Class B

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs PSRAX

49% FI Score
  • psrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Pioneer Strategic Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs EDEN

49% FI Score
  • eden
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

iShares MSCI Denmark ETF

Expenses: 0.53% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs DEW

49% FI Score
  • dew
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund

Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs ISEM

49% FI Score
  • isem
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Invesco RAFI Strategic Emerging Markets ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs DDM

49% FI Score
  • ddm
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProShares Ultra Dow30

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs KCCIX

49% FI Score
  • kccix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Knights of Columbus Core Bond Fund I Shares

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs RTM

49% FI Score
  • rtm
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs GSMUX

49% FI Score
  • gsmux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs FPACX

49% FI Score
  • fpacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

FPA Crescent Fund

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs USTB

49% FI Score
  • ustb
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

VictoryShares USAA Core Short-Term Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.34% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs HDVSX

49% FI Score
  • hdvsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Hartford International Equity Fund Class R4

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare USEQ vs EVLMC

49% FI Score
  • evlmc
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Eaton Vance TABS 5-to-15 Year Laddered Municipal Bond NextShares

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo