ULST : SPDR SSgA Ultra Short Term Bond ETF

ULST is a Alternative Market Short with LOW fees.

ULST

SPDR SSgA Ultra Short Term Bond ETF

FI Score

52 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

8 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,034 Alternative Short funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ULST vs NUGCX

14% FI Score
  • nugcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Nuveen Santa Barbara Global Dividend Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs DWAFX

14% FI Score
  • dwafx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Arrow DWA Balanced Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs EFCNX

14% FI Score
  • efcnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Emerald Insights Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs RYAZX

14% FI Score
  • ryazx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs COGLX

14% FI Score
  • coglx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Cognios Large Cap Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs EPIBX

14% FI Score
  • epibx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

EuroPac International Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs RYRRX

14% FI Score
  • ryrrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Rydex Russell 2000 Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs AYBCX

14% FI Score
  • aybcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

AllianzGI High Yield Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs MISEX

14% FI Score
  • misex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Midas Magic

Expenses: 3.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs NGQCX

14% FI Score
  • ngqcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Neuberger Berman Integrated Large Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs NSHCX

14% FI Score
  • nshcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Neuberger Berman Short Duration Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs AMJCX

14% FI Score
  • amjcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

American Century Multi-Asset Income Fund C Class

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs LCATX

14% FI Score
  • lcatx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Leader Capital Leader Total Return Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 2.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs IMSAX

14% FI Score
  • imsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

IMS Dividend Growth Fund

Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs NGINX

14% FI Score
  • nginx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia Georgia Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs NEHCX

14% FI Score
  • nehcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Loomis Sayles High Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs PFHCX

14% FI Score
  • pfhcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Pacific Funds Small-Cap Value Class C

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs PXRAX

14% FI Score
  • pxrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Virtus Duff & Phelps International Real Estate Securities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs AEQIX

14% FI Score
  • aeqix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Ascendant Deep Value Bond Fund Class I Shares

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs AGCCX

14% FI Score
  • agccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

AB Unconstrained Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo