ULST : SPDR SSgA Ultra Short Term Bond ETF

ULST is a Alternative Market Short with LOW fees.

ULST

SPDR SSgA Ultra Short Term Bond ETF

FI Score

52 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

8 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,034 Alternative Short funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ULST vs GAMDX

16% FI Score
  • gamdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Goldman Sachs Local Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs AFTCX

16% FI Score
  • aftcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2020 Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs RYTIX

16% FI Score
  • rytix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Rydex Technology Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs HEQFX

16% FI Score
  • heqfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Monteagle Opportunity Equity Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs RJN

16% FI Score
  • rjn
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

ELEMENTS Linked to the Rogers International Commodity Index - Energy Total Return

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs GCLLX

16% FI Score
  • gcllx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Goldman Sachs Flexible Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs TRFTX

16% FI Score
  • trftx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Patriot Fund Class I Shares

Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs INTLX

16% FI Score
  • intlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Forester Discovery Fund

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs IASMX

16% FI Score
  • iasmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs VRGCX

16% FI Score
  • vrgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2040 Fund Class CX

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs JMNSX

16% FI Score
  • jmnsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

JPMorgan Research Market Neutral Fund Class I

Expenses: 3.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs WAFMX

16% FI Score
  • wafmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Wasatch Frontier Emerging Small Countries Fund Investor Class Shares

Expenses: 2.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs GLNCX

16% FI Score
  • glncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Global New Discovery Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs GLNBX

16% FI Score
  • glnbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Global New Discovery Fund Class B

Expenses: 2.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs VRCCX

16% FI Score
  • vrccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2020 Fund Class CX

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs TIAGX

16% FI Score
  • tiagx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs UNWPX

16% FI Score
  • unwpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs VGEIX

16% FI Score
  • vgeix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

Virtus Vontobel Greater European Opportunities Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs PJDCX

16% FI Score
  • pjdcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ULST vs FRFDX

16% FI Score
  • frfdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Delaware Floating Rate II Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo