• hfkvx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• Total US Bond Market

Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond Fund Class SDR

Expenses: 0.46% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

• hslvx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Growth

Hartford Small Cap Growth Fund Class R6

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

• fnx
• ETF
• US Stocks
• Mid-Cap Blend

First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund

Expenses: 0.61% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• fpe
• ETF
• Other
• Preferred Stock

First Trust Preferred Securities and Income ETF

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Preferred Stock Other fund. See why »

• hwdyx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

The Hartford World Bond Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• ibmn
• ETF
• Bond
• Municipal Bond

iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

• fscsx
• Mutual Fund
• Sector Equity
• Technology

Fidelity® Select Software & IT Services Portfolio

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

• gal
• ETF
• Allocation
• All-In-One

SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

• itbax
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• Total US Bond Market

The Hartford Total Return Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

• divo
• ETF
• Other
• Options-based

Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF

Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Options-based Other fund. See why »