Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
3 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$UCON Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ryhhx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Rydex High Yield Strategy Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hiiix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Catalyst/SMH High Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- szecx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
DWS Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mwstx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Metropolitan West Strategic Income Fund Class M
Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gcmdx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Goldman Sachs Local Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- embax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
VanEck Emerging Markets Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ftibx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Federated Global Total Return Bond Fund Class C Shares
Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bxhcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Barings U.S. High Yield Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- aif
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Apollo Tactical Income Fund Inc.
Expenses: 4.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »