Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$TSVIX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,182 US Stocks Mid-Cap Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- bmaax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Sterling Capital Maryland Intermediate Tax-Free Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bxiax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Barings Global Credit Income Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rebcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Columbia Emerging Markets Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- daemx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- dbocx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
BNY Mellon Balanced Opportunity Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- deur
- ETF
- Money Market
- World
Citigroup ETNs linked to the VelocityShares Daily 4X Long USD vs. EUR Index
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a World Money Market fund. See why »
- diva
- ETF
- Alternatives
- Short
AGFiQ Hedged Dividend Income Fund
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
- ryamx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Short
Guggenheim Long Short Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
- eisix
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Value
Carillon ClariVest International Stock Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »