Expense Ratio Rating
10 /10
Expense Rating
8 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
3 /10
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class R4
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Janus Henderson Adaptive Global Allocation Fund Class T
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Lazard Global Dynamic Multi-Asset Portfolio Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
New Alternatives Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Janus Henderson Dividend & Income Builder Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
WCM Focused Global Growth Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
AdvisorOne CLS Global Aggressive Equity Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2024 Adam Fortuna
Site Map