TSALX : TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund Retail Class

TSALX is a Allocation Market All-In-One with LOW fees.

TSALX

TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund Retail Class

FI Score

53 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

6 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,682 Allocation All-In-One funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare TSALX vs RYMDX

17% FI Score
  • rymdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Rydex Mid-Cap 1.5x Strategy Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare TSALX vs EIXIX

17% FI Score
  • eixix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Catalyst Enhanced Income Strategy Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TSALX vs SAJCX

17% FI Score
  • sajcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

AIG Japan Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TSALX vs ETABX

17% FI Score
  • etabx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eventide Limited-Term Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TSALX vs ETCDX

17% FI Score
  • etcdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Eventide Dividend Opportunities Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TSALX vs PGYCX

17% FI Score
  • pgycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Pioneer Global High Yield Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TSALX vs OVECX

17% FI Score
  • ovecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Sterling Capital Mid Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TSALX vs GCLLX

16% FI Score
  • gcllx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Goldman Sachs Flexible Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TSALX vs UGPIX

16% FI Score
  • ugpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProFunds UltraChina Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare TSALX vs JMNSX

16% FI Score
  • jmnsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

JPMorgan Research Market Neutral Fund Class I

Expenses: 3.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare TSALX vs VGEIX

16% FI Score
  • vgeix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

Virtus Vontobel Greater European Opportunities Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TSALX vs RJN

16% FI Score
  • rjn
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

ELEMENTS Linked to the Rogers International Commodity Index - Energy Total Return

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare TSALX vs PJDCX

16% FI Score
  • pjdcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TSALX vs PWRIX

16% FI Score
  • pwrix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Power Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TSALX vs TSFCX

16% FI Score
  • tsfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Touchstone Small Cap Class C

Expenses: 2.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TSALX vs RYBHX

16% FI Score
  • rybhx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TSALX vs SEGIX

16% FI Score
  • segix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TSALX vs UNWPX

16% FI Score
  • unwpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare TSALX vs QBDAX

16% FI Score
  • qbdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Quantified Managed Income Fund Advisor Class

Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare TSALX vs RBCGX

16% FI Score
  • rbcgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo