Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
1 /10
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
MFS Global Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund Class Y
Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Goldman Sachs Satellite Strategies Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Hartford Global Impact Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Columbia Select Global Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Virtus SGA Global Growth I Class
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Gabelli Global Growth Fund Class AAA
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Wells Fargo Global Small Cap Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Federated Hermes SDG Engagement Equity Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
BNY Mellon Global Equity Income Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2024 Adam Fortuna
Site Map