Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
1 /10
$TRXAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- dacfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AlphaSimplex Multi-Asset Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- hgdax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AAM/HIMCO Global Enhanced Dividend Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gndcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Invesco Global Low Volatility Equity Yield Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gllax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Aberdeen Global Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- glbix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Leuthold Global Fund Class Institutional
Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- icopx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Invesco Global Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- caxcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Catalyst/MAP Global Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- lstox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Lazard Global Strategic Equity Portfolio Open Shares
Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ourax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Mission-Auour Risk-Managed Global Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »