Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
2 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$TRIGX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,471 International Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- jmst
- ETF
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Income ETF
Expenses: 0.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- omeax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
JPMorgan Market Expansion Enhanced Index Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ssdwx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
State Street Target Retirement 2060 Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.04% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- gmwzx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2025 Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.34% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- fconx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Short
Fidelity® Conservative Income Bond Fund
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »
- dial
- ETF
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF
Expenses: 0.28% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- mntrx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund - Class Admin
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- trrux
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
T. Rowe Price Target 2020 Fund
Expenses: 0.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- hfmtx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
The Hartford MidCap Fund Class R5
Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- jmin
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
JPMorgan U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF
Expenses: 0.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- gsy
- ETF
- Alternative
- Short
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF
Expenses: 0.23% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »
- hbaix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Hartford Moderate Allocation Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- hfmix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
The Hartford MidCap Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- hgoyx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
The Hartford Growth Opportunities Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- jaenx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Janus Henderson Enterprise Fund Class T
Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- iyt
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Industrials
iShares Transportation Average ETF
Expenses: 0.42% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »
- jafix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Janus Henderson Flexible Bond Fund Class T
Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- lbndx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- psch
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Healthcare
Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF
Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »