Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
2 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$TRDFX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 310 US Stocks Small Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- pxscx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Pax Small Cap Fund Individual Investor Class
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- oscnx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Invesco Oppenheimer Main Street Small Cap Fund Class R
Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- jtucx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
JPMorgan U.S. Small Company Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ninax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- szcax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
DWS Small Cap Core Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- iysax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Ivy Small Cap Core Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- cdofx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- sqlv
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Legg Mason Small-Cap Quality Value ETF
Expenses: 0.62% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- lzscx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Lazard US Small-Mid Cap Equity Portfolio Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »