TOCQX : Tocqueville Fund

TOCQX is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with HIGH fees.

TOCQX

Tocqueville Fund

FI Score

31 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare TOCQX vs FRA

38% FI Score
  • fra
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund Inc

Expenses: 2.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TOCQX vs JGH

38% FI Score
  • jgh
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Nuveen Global High Income Fund

Expenses: 2.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TOCQX vs VCRIX

38% FI Score
  • vcrix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Global Equity

MainStay CBRE Global Infrastructure Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »

Compare TOCQX vs EAEMX

38% FI Score
  • eaemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Parametric Emerging Markets Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TOCQX vs MDSIX

38% FI Score
  • mdsix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Integrity Short Term Government Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TOCQX vs URTAX

38% FI Score
  • urtax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

JPMorgan Realty Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare TOCQX vs USEMX

38% FI Score
  • usemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

USAA Emerging Markets Fund

Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TOCQX vs PVPAX

38% FI Score
  • pvpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

PIMCO RealPath Blend 2040 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare TOCQX vs FDCPX

38% FI Score
  • fdcpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Fidelity® Select Computers Portfolio

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare TOCQX vs PYMCX

38% FI Score
  • pymcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

PIMCO High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TOCQX vs OPNYX

38% FI Score
  • opnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester AMT-Free New York Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TOCQX vs FXP

38% FI Score
  • fxp
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare TOCQX vs PPDM

38% FI Score
  • ppdm
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

PortfolioPlus Developed Markets ETF

Expenses: 0.51% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare TOCQX vs OCACX

38% FI Score
  • ocacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester California Municipal Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TOCQX vs OAREX

38% FI Score
  • oarex
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Oakmark International Small Cap Service Class

Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TOCQX vs DINCX

38% FI Score
  • dincx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Morgan Stanley Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund Class L

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare TOCQX vs IMNYX

38% FI Score
  • imnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Western Asset Intermediate Maturity New York Municipals Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare TOCQX vs HJPNX

38% FI Score
  • hjpnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

Hennessy Japan Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare TOCQX vs UPMMX

38% FI Score
  • upmmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund Adviser Shares

Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare TOCQX vs JRS

38% FI Score
  • jrs
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund

Expenses: 2.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo