Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
2 /10
Market Score
8 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
8 /10
$TICSX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 310 US Stocks Small Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ninax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- wemmx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund Class AAA
Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- szcax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
DWS Small Cap Core Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- qsslx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
AQR TM Small Cap Multi-Style Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- smcix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Shelton Capital Management S&P Smallcap Index Fund Direct Shares
Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- smecx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Invesco Small Cap Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- sscox
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Touchstone Small Company Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- jgaux
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
JPMorgan Small Cap Core Fund Class R3
Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- afsm
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »