Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$TEPLX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- warcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Wells Fargo Absolute Return Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ogicx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Invesco Oppenheimer Global Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- altfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- pgrnx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Pax Global Environmental Markets Fund Individual Investor Class
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- twggx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
American Century Focused Global Growth Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- tctl
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
Premise Capital Diversified Tactical ETF
Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- jppix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Janus Henderson Global Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mdgcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.Investor A Shares
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- pxeax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Pax Global Environmental Markets Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »