• ogig
• ETF
• Sector Equity
• Technology

O'Shares Global Internet Giants ETF

Expenses: 0.48% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

• aggax
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

Invesco Global Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• picb
• ETF
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Invesco International Corporate Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• aldax
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Columbia Limited Duration Credit Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• aofcx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Growth

Alger Small Cap Focus Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

• ngdax
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Growth

Neuberger Berman Guardian Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

• nifax
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• Government Bond

Nationwide Inflation-Protected Securities Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.57% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

• nlcax
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Growth

Voya Large-Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

• nmcix
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Mid-Cap Growth

Voya MidCap Opportunities Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

• nntwx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Mid-Cap Growth

Nicholas II Fund Class N

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »