Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
0 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
0 /10
$TAGS Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 11,417 Commodities Focused funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- voog
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund ETF Shares
Expenses: 0.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- wacpx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Western Asset Core Plus Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- xlb
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Basic Materials
Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund
Expenses: 0.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »
- xle
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Energy
Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund
Expenses: 0.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »
- xlre
- ETF
- Alternatives
- Real Estate
The Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund
Expenses: 0.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »
- vsgbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
Vanguard Short-Term Federal Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- spsb
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
SPDR Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.07% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dblfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.41% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- dspix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
BNY Mellon Institutional S&P 500 Stock Index Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »