SXPAX : DWS S&P 500 Index Fund - Class A

SXPAX is a US Stocks Market Large Blend index fund with MODERATE fees.

SXPAX

DWS S&P 500 Index Fund - Class A

FI Score

62 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

4 /10

Market Score

6 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

6 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare SXPAX vs GIOPX

39% FI Score
  • giopx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Guggenheim Macro Opportunities Fund Class P

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SXPAX vs SNLN

39% FI Score
  • snln
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Highland/iBoxx Senior Loan ETF

Expenses: 0.61% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SXPAX vs EDF

39% FI Score
  • edf
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SXPAX vs WILNX

39% FI Score
  • wilnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

William Blair International Leaders Fund Class N Shares

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SXPAX vs JHAA

39% FI Score
  • jhaa
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Nuveen High Income 2023 Target Term Fund

Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SXPAX vs NCDMX

39% FI Score
  • ncdmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderate Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SXPAX vs NGCAX

39% FI Score
  • ngcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Columbia Greater China Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare SXPAX vs NNYCX

39% FI Score
  • nnycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Nuveen New York Municipal Bond Fund Class C2

Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SXPAX vs NSBIX

39% FI Score
  • nsbix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Neuberger Berman Short Duration Bond Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SXPAX vs JOBIX

39% FI Score
  • jobix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

JOHCM Global Income Builder Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SXPAX vs JPS

39% FI Score
  • jps
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Preferred Stock

Nuveen Preferred & Income Securities Fund

Expenses: 3.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Preferred Stock Other fund. See why »

Compare SXPAX vs OGMNX

39% FI Score
  • ogmnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Invesco Oppenheimer Gold & Special Minerals Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare SXPAX vs KMF

39% FI Score
  • kmf
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Master Limited Partnership

Kayne Anderson Midstream/Energy Fund, Inc.

Expenses: 4.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Master Limited Partnership Other fund. See why »

Compare SXPAX vs PABBX

39% FI Score
  • pabbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Balanced Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SXPAX vs QGRCX

39% FI Score
  • qgrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SXPAX vs PADAX

39% FI Score
  • padax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare SXPAX vs PAIIX

39% FI Score
  • paiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • International

PIMCO Global Bond Opportunities Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A

Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a International Bond fund. See why »

Compare SXPAX vs PBPAX

39% FI Score
  • pbpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

PIMCO RealPath Blend 2030 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SXPAX vs PBW

39% FI Score
  • pbw
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare SXPAX vs MAPCX

39% FI Score
  • mapcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

BlackRock Asian Dragon Fund,Inc.Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo