• ncgfx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

New Covenant Growth Fund

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• nraax
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• rodi
• ETF
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Barclays Return on Disability ETN

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• usgix
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

USAA Growth & Income Fund Adviser Shares

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• gssqx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Insights Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• msoix
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

MainStay MacKay Common Stock Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.72% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• agizx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Alger Growth & Income Fund Class Z

Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• nsbcx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

Nuveen Santa Barbara Dividend Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• sye
• ETF
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

SPDR MFS Systematic Core Equity ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• jiisx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Blend

JPMorgan Intrepid Sustainable Equity Fund I Class

Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »