• fndc
• ETF
• International Stocks
• Mid-Cap Blend

Schwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF

Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

• hyg
• ETF
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• igf
• ETF
• Allocation
• Global Equity

iShares Global Infrastructure ETF

Expenses: 0.46% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »

• imoyx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

Pioneer Solutions - Balanced Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.27% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• ixj
• ETF
• Sector Equity
• Healthcare

iShares Global Healthcare ETF

Expenses: 0.46% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

• wardx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

Wells Fargo Absolute Return Fund - Class Admin

Expenses: 0.57% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• splb
• ETF
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.07% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• wmfdx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• Municipal Bond

Wells Fargo Municipal Bond Fund - Class Admin

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

• xlf
• ETF
• Sector Equity
• Financial Services

Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund

Expenses: 0.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

• xt
• ETF
• Allocation
• Other

iShares Exponential Technologies ETF

Expenses: 0.47% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »