Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$SVLCX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,043 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ryafx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Inverse
Rydex Inverse Russell 2000® Strategy Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »
- ryshx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Inverse
Rydex Inverse Russell 2000® Strategy Fund Class H
Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »
- srmcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
DWS Short Term Municipal Bond Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tcpcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Touchstone Impact Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- thnmx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Thornburg New Mexico Intermediate Municipal Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tsscx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Thornburg Strategic Municipal Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- uapix
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Leveraged Equities
ProFunds UltraSmall Cap Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »
- vslcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Senior Loan Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- wagox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Wasatch Global Opportunities Fund® Investor Class
Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »