Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
2 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$SVAIX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 566 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- qdef
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund
Expenses: 0.37% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- mddvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
BlackRock Equity Dividend Fund Investor A Shares
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- fta
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- malvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.54% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- alvsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
American Century Large Company Value Fund I Class
Expenses: 0.64% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- nulv
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- oieix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
JPMorgan Equity Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- twqix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Transamerica Large Cap Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- oiepx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
JPMorgan Equity Income Fund Class R3
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »